<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/23/21 7:38 PM, Ben Bucksch wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:43c2a6b5-e369-a056-99dd-38e0c1c431dc@beonex.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 23.03.21 um 21:23 schrieb Magnus
Melin:<br>
</div>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:4e5d4ca4-da72-a996-0d07-a7966ba58ab1@iki.fi">
<ul>
</ul>
<p>Semi-private lists; move to private google groups (since
addresses should kept, and other reasons):<br>
</p>
<ul>
<li>tb-election</li>
<li>thunderbird-drivers</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Objection here. tb-election is not a private list, nor a
semi-private list, but for all active community members. Moving
that to Google Groups would mean voter exclusion. You would
exclude exactly those community members that want privacy and
decentralization.</p>
</blockquote>
I think that what was meant by a "private list" is that it is
invite-only. I forget whether the archives are public or not though.
I think that your complain is valid, just wanted to point out that I
don't think that's what was meant by "private".<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:43c2a6b5-e369-a056-99dd-38e0c1c431dc@beonex.com">
<p> </p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:4e5d4ca4-da72-a996-0d07-a7966ba58ab1@iki.fi">
<ul>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>maildev</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>We need maildev to communicate with other developers. We want
to be an open project, not one where only employees decide.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm not sure where you got from closing maildev to only letting
employees making decisions. The rationale for removing maildev was
that it is a list that isn't really used any the traffic from it
can be on tb-planning.</p>
<p>--Patrick<br>
</p>
<br>
</body>
</html>