<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-unicode">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Jörg Knobloch wrote on maildev (I'm
just re-posting here):<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/05/2020 09:32, Magnus Melin
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:f3089ddd-9d6f-8541-02a9-100aeb9fd843@iki.fi"><a
href="https://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net">maildev
mailing list</a>
<ol>
<li>Most if not all of the maildev members are also on
tb-planning.</li>
<li>The list hasn't had too much traffic, since whether to
choose this or tb-planning is not easy.</li>
<li>Its original purpose of serving as a more moderated forum
for technical discussion has proven generally non-feasible:
details of technical decisions are better discussed on
specific bugs with the people who have, or are gaining
knowledge about the specifics involved. </li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p><tt>Point 1: These lists have different moderation rules.</tt></p>
<p><tt>Point 2: These lists have very different purposes: For
example, if you want to discuss the pitfalls of Mork-removal,
then tb-planning is *not* the right list.</tt></p>
<p><tt>Point 3: Not-feasible? Why? We had a few useful discussions
here. Not all the technical people follow all the bugs. Also,
please refer to</tt></p>
<p><tt><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/tb-planning/2017-July/005610.html">https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/tb-planning/2017-July/005610.html</a></tt></p>
<p><tt>Jörg.</tt></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>