<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">A fair question as to this being a
      hypothetical situation. <br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">The situation actually exists on the
      current council, and this direction evolved from the issues
      related to not having an NDA.  Also there is no intention to
      discourage participation, else, assuming the majority of members
      acted as responsible representatives, the motion would have been
      voted down.</div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/20/20 2:28 PM, alta88 wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:85e0832a-0783-1db9-839c-363521a58d39@fixall.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <p><font size="+1"><font face="Century Schoolbook L">As I said,
            farfetched. Sorry to belabor, but is this concern due to an
            actual experience or something lawyers have merely planted.
            It is a key skill to know how to manage lawyers. <br>
          </font></font></p>
      <p><font size="+1"><font face="Century Schoolbook L">Whether
            intentional or not, the effect will clearly be to discourage
            new electors from participating.</font></font></p>
      <p><font size="+1"><font face="Century Schoolbook L">And if that
            farfetched really long tail risk is an issue, then certainly
            it will lead to the council being encouraged to pay for key
            man (sic) and directors insurance and an hr department. Is
            that where this project is going?<br>
          </font></font></p>
      <p><br>
      </p>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 20/04/2020 10.22, Wayne wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
        cite="mid:53f5d8a6-1fcd-4b37-fb19-dbdeebe2c974@lehigh.edu">
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=UTF-8">
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/20/20 11:59 AM, alta88 wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote type="cite"
          cite="mid:7cc2961e-5c7c-c026-f88f-9b7eece16e7c@fixall.com">
          <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
            charset=UTF-8">
          <p><br>
          </p>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/04/2020 15.45, Wayne Mery
            wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote type="cite"
            cite="mid:2ce7432a-90bb-35fb-0942-056538eb407a@lehigh.edu">
            <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
              charset=UTF-8">
            <p>To: Thunderbird Community<br>
              <br>
              It is now April and normally our elections process would
              be well under way.  So we want to give you an update of
              our status.<br>
              <br>
              Much of the council work involves sensitive financial and
              personnel matters, and also working with confidential
              information which flows through Mozilla, all of which
              require a Mozilla NDA. Therefore, it has been approved by
              the council that electors who stand for election to the
              next council term shall commit to signing an NDA at the
              time they agree to stand for election. </p>
          </blockquote>
          <p>Are you saying privileged information will be imparted to
            potential electors prior to their actual election or non
            election? Because if not, then this makes no sense at all.
            It is fine to communicate the requirement of signing an NDA
            as a condition of taking a council seat, if elected. Or are
            you worried someone will be elected and refuse to sign an
            NDA? Seems farfetched.</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p><br>
        </p>
        <p>Perhaps I didn't state this completely clearly.  There is no
          privileged information to be provided during the election.
          Yes, the requirement is that someone who agrees to be placed
          on the election ballot and voted it, shall commit to signing
          the NDA as a precondition prior to the vote.  The reason for
          this language is because will be quite awkward and disruptive,
          will it not, if someone is elected and then doesn't then sign
          the NDA - we'd then need to hold elections again just for that
          person's position.  <br>
        </p>
        <br>
        <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
        <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
tb-planning mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tb-planning@mozilla.org" moz-do-not-send="true">tb-planning@mozilla.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning" moz-do-not-send="true">https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning</a>
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
tb-planning mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tb-planning@mozilla.org">tb-planning@mozilla.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning">https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>