<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Hi Phillip and all,<br>
</p>
<p>On 28/09/19 1:54 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:F82A68AB-BC94-476C-BB07-BD9D705B7633@thunderbird.net">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">I'm wondering if we ever got anywhere with this.
...
jwq would you be able to tell us which of the forks could be considered "latest", i.e. most likely to work in Thunderbird 68?
Have you tried reaching out to the current authors on addons.mozilla.org?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
The current definitive ExchangeCalendar repository is <<a
href="https://github.com/ExchangeCalendar/exchangecalendar">https://github.com/ExchangeCalendar/exchangecalendar</a>>
which was created with the intention, as far as I can tell, of
becoming a community resource. <br>
</p>
<p> ExchangeCalendar is currently not published on ATN but I have
contacted the current maintainers on GitHub, the primary
discussion is in Issue <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://github.com/ExchangeCalendar/exchangecalendar/issues/163">exchangecalendar#163</a>
<i>Publish to Thunderbird Addon Directory</i>. ExchangeCalendar
was submitted for review on 2 September by Markus, the current
maintainer.<br>
</p>
<p> There are two maintainers listed on the <a
href="https://github.com/orgs/ExchangeCalendar/people">People</a>
page but Adrien indicated in <a
href="https://github.com/ExchangeCalendar/exchangecalendar/issues/163">exchangecalendar#163</a>
that he is unlikely to contribute to the code in the future, so
there is effectively only one maintainer.<br>
<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:F82A68AB-BC94-476C-BB07-BD9D705B7633@thunderbird.net">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">I'm happy to facilitate in getting this resolved, maybe it would make sense to continue the discussion on a thread with Ryan, Christopher and me.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
That would be great! I think we all acknowledge that Outlook
Exchange support is critically important but also that the
resources available to update and maintain the code are very
scarce.<br>
</p>
<p> I must say that I'm not keen on the rewrite suggested by John
Bieling, for several reasons, the primary one being that a working
add-on is worth two non-functional rewrites in progress.<br>
</p>
<p> I'm much keener on the suggestion of getting Ben B on-board :-)<br>
</p>
<p> The obvious next step is to find out the results of the review,
if they are available. I added a comment to <a
href="https://github.com/ExchangeCalendar/exchangecalendar/issues/163">exchangecalendar#163</a>
just a few minutes ago, enquiring after the results.<br>
</p>
<p>jwq.</p>
<p><br>
Sent from my bugzilla account, which does not accept non-list
email.<br>
<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>