<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19-05-30 14 h 52, Eric Moore wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:5fd13459-28c3-89d2-de40-084ae5434bbc@fastmail.fm"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/thunderbird"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/thunderbird</a>
<br>
[...]<br>
<br>
What is its status? <br>
What is "Store Ports"? <br>
Who supports it? <br>
<br>
This raises a related question. Many Linux distro's have their own
build of Thunderbird. While they have some modifications I don't
consider them a port. They're just a distro specific build, and
something you can expect to get support from at SUMO and
MozilaZine despite not being released by Mozilla. What determines
whether an email application can legally call itself Thunderbird?
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>This should help:<br>
</p>
<ul>
<li><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/foundation/trademarks/list/">Thunderbird
is a Mozilla trademark</a></li>
<li><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/foundation/trademarks/policy/">Mozilla
trademark guidelines</a></li>
</ul>
<p>There is also <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:opensourcedevelopment@outlook.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">"opensourcedevelopment@outlook.com"</a>
listed for "Thunderbird support" which I doubt goes to any
official support channel (or even community).</p>
<p>F.<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>