<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2019-05-08 8:33 a.m., harry wrote:
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:8680351f-a6bb-997b-8cd9-1b88f86fd1dd@muenchen-mail.de">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">1) As to the second text block “secure and private”:
Yes, I would think that “remote content blocking” is a valuable option.
But I wonder whether “do not track” isn’t rather something that applies
for a browser in the first place. (yes, I know, TB does have browser
functionality; I still can’t think of any occasion where “do not track”
could be of any use for me in Thunderbird);</pre>
</blockquote>
Thanks for your suggestion, we will tackle content once this new
version is up on the beta url.
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:8680351f-a6bb-997b-8cd9-1b88f86fd1dd@muenchen-mail.de">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">2) Why should the section about bugs in Thunderbird (“all bugs have been
fixed” – “April fools”) be so prominent on this page? While probably
everybody who knows anything about software is well aware that there is
no such thing as a bug-free software, you will scare away people outside
of that category who will be scared away from such a seemingly buggy
product. IMHO this should definitely be “hidden” in the community section;</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>That's a blog post. That section shows the recent posts published
on our blog. That content will change pretty often.<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<span style="color:#666;font-family:mono; font-size:small"><b>Alessandro
Castellani</b><br>
Lead UX Architect<br>
Thunderbird</span></div>
</body>
</html>