<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>On 2019-05-01 3:21 a.m., Axel Grude wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:32963102-4e9a-e772-e439-0f0133e84028@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<div id="smartTemplate4-template">
<style>
#ag, #ag p {
font-family: Cambria, Georgia, serif !important;
}</style> </div>
<div id="smartTemplate4-quoteHeader">
<style type="text/css" scoped="">
#newHeaderAG1 b { font-weight:bold; color: #990033; min-width: 4.5em; max-width:none; display:inline-block;}</style></div>
<p>could you add a breadcrumb link trail at the top / bottom just
to see what it feels like? </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I don't think that would be a good idea.</p>
<p>Other than cramping the dialog with extra clickable links, a
breadcrumb doesn't really make sense in this context as the entire
funnel is a 3 steps total workflow, with the input fields always
visible. Users don't really need to go back to change anything,
other than selecting another funnel (set up calendar, rss, etc).
The back button can handle history without the necessity of a
breadcrumb.<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:32963102-4e9a-e772-e439-0f0133e84028@gmail.com">
<p>Also, is the setup dialog planned to go "full screen" within
the Thunderbird client window, or is that too much?<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Better keep this as a dialog as it helps maintaining the focus on
a small area and prevents overwhelming feelings. Putting this in
full screen can bring in many problematic in terms of empty space,
alignment, and focal points.<br>
</p>
<p>A series of updated mock-ups will come later today.<br>
Thank you all for your outstanding involvement in the process!</p>
<p>Cheers<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<span style="color:#666;font-family:mono; font-size:small"><b>Alessandro
Castellani</b><br>
Lead UX Architect<br>
Thunderbird</span></div>
</body>
</html>