<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2019-04-26 3:15 p.m., alex wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:5b0cc502-b491-ab42-e63f-a4005a053ba6@thunderbird.net">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>Hello wonderful people!<br>
<br>
Here's a little experiment...<br>
<br>
I was looking at the overall design of the home page, while
doing some UX mock-ups for the application, and I couldn't shake
off the feelings of "disconnection" and "heaviness".<br>
<br>
I decided to apply a new visual style to the content and the
flow we defined, pushing for a brighter identity, and using only
colors available from our styleguide.<br>
<br>
You can see both design iterations here (use your keyboard
arrows to move through screen 1 and 2): <a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://invis.io/7WRQVWSCAUE">https://invis.io/7WRQVWSCAUE</a><br>
While I like v1, I think the brighter v2 feels more modern,
proposing an easily digestible and appealing color palette,
while pushing a bit of brand identity which will be reflected in
the actual email client (more on that to come).<br>
<br>
Keep in mind that this is a simple aesthetic choice, so it all
comes down to what we like and what we don't, and I'd love to
hear your thoughts on which direction feels more inline with the
Thunderbird identity.</p>
</blockquote>
<font size="-1"><i><br>
</i>We could A/B test and see which gets more people to click on
the Download button ;)<br>
<br>
I like the darker background, I generally dislike all the very
bright backgrounds encountered on the web. Darker backgrounds are
also easier on the eyes for me. Yes, I turn on Dark Mode in just
about every software I have with it.<br>
<i></i></font>
</body>
</html>