<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02-Apr-19 9:37 PM, u wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:3e1cb016-a82d-b21f-269e-5f9deab8fbb5@451f.org">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Hi!
On 01.04.19 05:07, Christopher Leidigh wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">In order to focus our efforts as well as educate myself, I've put together
some ATN database mining
on both extensions and authors. I used data bars so far as opposed to
charts (tricky for me without mouse)
I'm trying to get the top level stuff first to create some items. I'm
hoping to have similar information
covering Authors for Tuesday's call. If their questions were requests
before then I can attempt to answer them.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
Your data only accounts for people installing Addons via
addons.thunderbird.org, is that correct?
Users on Debian based operating systems generally install addons from
distro-repositories, </pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<i>That is a state of affairs that needs to be actively
discouraged. The version of Thunderbird being offered in some
distributions are little more than forks with whole panels of
settings removed. Can not tell a ubuntu user to check the install
history in Edit > Preferences > Update as that panel is just
not there for them. I am to the point of not offering support to
users of certain distributions because I am unfamiliar with the
product they are using. With maintainers modifying code, the
user interface and not offering bundled add-ons it is to the point
unless you are using the actual distribution and version you can
not do more than guess what the product even looks like. <br>
<br>
Matt<br>
</i>
</body>
</html>