<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 18/03/2019 12:51, Jörg Knobloch wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:d806b9df-916a-a256-9335-e78fe27efa1a@jorgk.com"
type="cite">On 18/03/2019 13:36, Onno Ekker wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">As a reviewer I'm always hesitant about
reviewing a cloned add-on that fixes compatibility issues.
There's a pletora of add-ons in the queue like ...2,
...Improved, ......Continued, ...Updated,
<br>
Some of the original add-ons have been updated, so the clone
isn't needed anymore.
<br>
In other cases the clone might be needed/ or useful, but it
would be better if the new add-on author would have contacted
the original one and see if he could also get access to the
add-on on ATN.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I'm all in favour of discouraging yet another clone.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Isn't one of the signs of a healthy open source ecosystem plenty of
forking?<br>
<br>
Shouldn't we be *pleased* that people want to contribute to the
ecosystem, rather than being unhappy about the way that they have
done it? :-)<br>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Mark Rousell
</pre>
</body>
</html>