<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">13.03.2019 u 9:56, Matt Harris je
napisao/la:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:dd7a8508-1c45-43f3-06fc-560ff7e6486e@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<i><br>
Do we really want folks searching add-ons in a browser? while
it might be good for Firefox where the browser is the
destination, we really don't want to show them the add-ons that
only work for V2 of the product and will not install in their
version. That is just poor public relations. Add-on perhaps
should be a "feature" and describe hot to locate/ search them in
the product, not a menu item at all.<br>
<br>
Matt</i><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes, "we" really do want to search add-ons in a browser. It's
easier, faster, you can open multiple tabs, compare add-ons etc.<br>
Thunderbird should discourage web surfing inside mail client, not
promote it. A lot of security risks are connected to that part of TB
and in the end, it's not Thunderbird goal to be web browser.<br>
<br>
Just came to my mind when I was writing this reply, if TB ever
decides to implement Firefox Sync, for any reason, it can be
upgraded with "Send add-on to Thunderbird" option, just like you can
send app from Google Play website to your mobile phone for
installation.<br>
<br>
Mihovil<br>
</body>
</html>