<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Firefox does not support install.rdf manifests at all, so that's
      not right. Thunderbird will likely not use them either, soon.<br>
    </p>
    <p>GL<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/10/18 21:51, Óvári wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:90c083da-b295-e977-ba7e-3cdc4c1df0a0@zoho.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <p>When is it planned that Thunderbird will support "*" for the
        maxVersion tag?<br>
        <span class="blob-code-inner blob-code-marker-deletion"> <font
            face="Courier New, Courier, monospace"><<span
              class="pl-ent">em</span><span class="pl-ent">:</span><span
              class="pl-ent">maxVersion</span>><span class="x
              x-first&#xA; x-last">*</span></<span class="pl-ent">em</span><span
              class="pl-ent">:</span><span class="pl-ent">maxVersion</span>></font></span></p>
      <p>Grammar Checker would have been using that except it does not
        work<br>
        <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://github.com/nuald/thb-gramchecker/commit/ac0d54109adbe74358fda2bbd58ad2196bd72e37"
          moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/nuald/thb-gramchecker/commit/ac0d54109adbe74358fda2bbd58ad2196bd72e37</a></p>
      <p>It is understood the Firefox supports "*" for the maxVersion
        tag? Can the code from Firefox be merged into Thunderbird?</p>
      <p>Thank you<br>
      </p>
      <br>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/10/18 18:20, Mark Banner wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
        cite="mid:6a0c0d47-098a-fee5-9519-c08f5e1bf64c@mozilla.com">On
        05/10/2018 06:38, Axel Grude wrote: <br>
        <blockquote type="cite">It may wor.  .. but the majority of
          developers can not guarantee future compatibility within this
          ESR period wit Mozilla's reckless changes removing xul
          support. I would tend to be cautious, test against 60.N and
          recommend setting maxver to 60.N.* instead. <br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        Err, why? The policies around ESR are unchanged (security &
        stability only). Why would we suddenly change the policy and
        upset those that rely on it? <br>
        <br>
        What benefits would it have to start changing ESR with respect
        to xul when we're not going to base anything else on those
        branches anyway? <br>
        <br>
        Mark <br>
        <br>
        _______________________________________________ <br>
        tb-planning mailing list <br>
        <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
          href="mailto:tb-planning@mozilla.org" moz-do-not-send="true">tb-planning@mozilla.org</a>
        <br>
        <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
          href="https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning"
          moz-do-not-send="true">https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning</a>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
tb-planning mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tb-planning@mozilla.org">tb-planning@mozilla.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning">https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>