<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Firefox does not support install.rdf manifests at all, so that's
not right. Thunderbird will likely not use them either, soon.<br>
</p>
<p>GL<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/10/18 21:51, Óvári wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:90c083da-b295-e977-ba7e-3cdc4c1df0a0@zoho.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>When is it planned that Thunderbird will support "*" for the
maxVersion tag?<br>
<span class="blob-code-inner blob-code-marker-deletion"> <font
face="Courier New, Courier, monospace"><<span
class="pl-ent">em</span><span class="pl-ent">:</span><span
class="pl-ent">maxVersion</span>><span class="x
x-first
 x-last">*</span></<span class="pl-ent">em</span><span
class="pl-ent">:</span><span class="pl-ent">maxVersion</span>></font></span></p>
<p>Grammar Checker would have been using that except it does not
work<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://github.com/nuald/thb-gramchecker/commit/ac0d54109adbe74358fda2bbd58ad2196bd72e37"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/nuald/thb-gramchecker/commit/ac0d54109adbe74358fda2bbd58ad2196bd72e37</a></p>
<p>It is understood the Firefox supports "*" for the maxVersion
tag? Can the code from Firefox be merged into Thunderbird?</p>
<p>Thank you<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/10/18 18:20, Mark Banner wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:6a0c0d47-098a-fee5-9519-c08f5e1bf64c@mozilla.com">On
05/10/2018 06:38, Axel Grude wrote: <br>
<blockquote type="cite">It may wor. .. but the majority of
developers can not guarantee future compatibility within this
ESR period wit Mozilla's reckless changes removing xul
support. I would tend to be cautious, test against 60.N and
recommend setting maxver to 60.N.* instead. <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Err, why? The policies around ESR are unchanged (security &
stability only). Why would we suddenly change the policy and
upset those that rely on it? <br>
<br>
What benefits would it have to start changing ESR with respect
to xul when we're not going to base anything else on those
branches anyway? <br>
<br>
Mark <br>
<br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
tb-planning mailing list <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:tb-planning@mozilla.org" moz-do-not-send="true">tb-planning@mozilla.org</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
tb-planning mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tb-planning@mozilla.org">tb-planning@mozilla.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning">https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>