<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body smarttemplateinserted="true" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div id="smartTemplate4-template"><img style="margin-top: 1em;
float: right; box-shadow: 1px 1px 2px rgba(20, 20, 20, 0.4);"
moz-do-not-send="false" class="myLogo"
src="cid:part1.467D6D70.82E30638@gmail.com" alt="Get
Thunderbird!" height="15" width="94">
</div>
<div id="smartTemplate4-quoteHeader">
<style type="text/css" scoped="">
#newHeaderAG1 b { font-weight:bold; color: #990033; min-width: 4.5em; max-width:none; display:inline-block;}
</style>
<blockquote type="cite" style="margin-bottom: -20px !important;
padding-bottom:20px !important;">
<div id="newHeaderAG1" style="font-size: x-small; padding:1em;
background-color:rgba(220,220,240,0.4); border-radius:3px;"> <b>Subject:</b>Re:
CardBook postulates to become a Thunderbird featured addon.<br>
<b>From:</b>Philipp Kewisch <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mozilla@kewis.ch"><mozilla@kewis.ch></a><br>
<b>To:</b>Jörg Knobloch; Tb-planning <br>
<b>Sent: </b>Monday, 10/04/2017 17:58:23 17:58 GMT ST +0100
[Week 15]<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote class=" cite"
id="mid_8f217896_cd5e_bec1_c65a_733ff3933088_kewis_ch"
cite="mid:8f217896-cd5e-bec1-c65a-733ff3933088@kewis.ch"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/10/17 6:19 PM, Jörg Knobloch
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class=" cite"
id="mid_1b7e64ad_75ff_5337_3275_4dbc18986ebd_jorgk_com"
type="cite"
cite="mid:1b7e64ad-75ff-5337-3275-4dbc18986ebd@jorgk.com">On
10/04/2017 17:35, Philipp Kewisch wrote: <br>
<blockquote class=" cite" id="Cite_7632411" type="cite"
style="color: #000000;">I'm not sure what this has to do with
the add-on being featured though. <br>
</blockquote>
Nothing really. <br>
<br>
<blockquote class=" cite" id="Cite_8579614" type="cite"
style="color: #000000;">Jörg, are you suggesting that those
requirements would be criteria for being featured? <br>
</blockquote>
No. <br>
</blockquote>
<p>Ok, thanks for the clarification. Given this thread is about
featuring an add-on I think we should stay on topic. I agree
that it would be great to have everyone working on core
features, but finding ways to encourage this is something we
should discuss separately (and also falls into the domain of a
community manager, btw).</p>
<p>Do you have an opinion on how Thunderbird should determine
featured add-ons?<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
I would quite like if highly positive review rating could be somehow
included (not necessarily number of users, because sometimes it's
hard to get discovered. If the current users love it, it's usually
useful to them.<br>
<br>
Axel<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>