<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body smarttemplateinserted="true" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24/03/2017 11:22, Jörg Knobloch
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class=" cite"
id="mid_d65483cd_8359_7d9d_f48a_3064257411d7_jorgk_com"
cite="mid:d65483cd-8359-7d9d-f48a-3064257411d7@jorgk.com"
type="cite">On 24/03/2017 03:07, Eric Moore wrote:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class=" cite" id="Cite_8611674" type="cite">
<br>
7) The Thunderbird section of Mozilla add-ons is littered with
many add-ons that claim to be unusable with Thunderbird, a
search always searches Firefox add-ons too despite the user
specifying Thunderbird, and not every add-on on that web site is
also available from tools -> add-ons -> get add-ons in
Thunderbird. If we can't even manage our own add-ons store what
does that say about how viable our organization is?
<br>
</blockquote>
Well, we must be in really good shape, since <b>managing our own
add-ons store</b> is actively being discussed as part of the
transition away from Mozilla</blockquote>
<p>\o/</p>
<p>Question: With this being planned, do we need to set up our own
extension review board? I would be interested in reviewing <i>mail
specific extensions exclusively</i>. But they are kind of hard
to find on AMO Editor site. What about "hybrid" addons that
support both Firefox + Thunderbird? They are usually problematic
(may not even add any functionality for Tb) and often don't really
contribute much to Tb as a mail client.<br>
</p>
<p>Axel</p>
<br>
</body>
</html>