<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 30-Dec-16 5:57 PM, Axel Grude wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPEFzP+id8RwAUf3m82GtPVF=n3pTa-GEyTe2_w3oGqWhoH0Cg@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="auto">I just had a deeper read into the documentation of
quill, especially
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><a href="https://quilljs.com/docs/formats/"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://quilljs.com/docs/formats/</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">And the restriction to a small well known number
of them</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">"By default all formats are enabled and allowed
to exist within a Quill editor and can be configured with the
formats option. "</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">is what worries me in a way that such modern
HTML editors always seem to restrict editing to a very reduced
number of HTML4 tags (prominently featuring inline elements
such as font) so they very much appear to restrict formatting
like most web editors (and their feature set sends to be
already provided by our current composer).</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">If we go through the trouble of replacing the
editor I think it ought to be more powerful and directed
towards building reusable style sheet templates for formatting
similar to a word ".dot" template file. <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<i>Agreed, but our methods of composing with a template need a huge
overhaul to make this useful to the average user, including the
use of placeholders for address book fields. One of the things
that hold folk back is we do not do write a new email with Christmas
stationary for example. You have to hunt up the description in a
list. This is a picture and preview based world now.<br>
<br>
Matt<br>
</i>
</body>
</html>