<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/09/2016 00:40, Matt Harris wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:39a54915-b141-135e-2597-ad6e46f32a31@gmail.com"><i>Just
how much sense will this interface make if the person has no
tagged messages? <br>
</i></blockquote>
Not a lot. This is for people who will filter on tags.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:39a54915-b141-135e-2597-ad6e46f32a31@gmail.com"><i>
Perhaps add a "no tag" entry to the tag list, So go with a
tagged / not tagged button that exposes the sub filters when
selected. In the "any of" list add a "Not Tagged" so the user
gets the finest grained search by including not tagged as a
criteria.<br>
</i></blockquote>
Sorry, there is a long discussion in the bug about a "pseudo-tag"
"Not tagged". This concept doesn't fly since it destroys the "All
Of" (and) conjunction amongst other oddities. People might want:
Untagged + (Work and Important).<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:39a54915-b141-135e-2597-ad6e46f32a31@gmail.com"><i> So
Mark 1 Plus a not tagged criteria. so there are three states
really but a two state button.</i></blockquote>
Sorry, that's not on offer. The offer is clear: Three options called
Mark 1, 1A and 2 as developed in the bug. Please vote via Google if
you want your vote to be counted.<br>
<br>
Jörg.<br>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>