<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12-Sep-16 6:27 AM, Jörg Knobloch
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0e670f6d-0d81-ccb1-ff5d-134f8040ce66@jorgk.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>In bug 683809[1], we've had a hard time agreeing on the
best UI for showing untagged messages in the Quick Filter. As
such, we're putting it to a vote. If you're reading this,
please take the poll (it's only one question!) and give us
your feedback: <a href="http://goo.gl/PfLQWL"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://goo.gl/PfLQWL</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<i>Just how much sense will this interface make if the person has no
tagged messages? <br>
<br>
I see "any of" and what appears to be a context list of used
filters. If it were not it would need half the screen to list all
the predefined filters. If there are no filters used, probably
the most common situation. Is this user interface going to be
intuitive? or does the "button" get enabled only if filters are
defined?<br>
<br>
Perhaps add a "no tag" entry to the tag list, So go with a tagged
/ not tagged button that exposes the sub filters when selected. In
the "any of" list add a "Not Tagged" so the user gets the finest
grained search by including not tagged as a criteria. So messages
that are not tagged, or tagged important or work can be
selected. I see a use case where folk would want to look at say
only tagged as work, or only things not tagged as work and
untagged messages.<br>
<br>
So Mark 1 Plus a not tagged criteria. so there are three states
really but a two state button.<br>
<br>
Matt<br>
</i>
</body>
</html>