<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 13/09/2016 05:33, Jim wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAF6z7pukkBFK1hFn8VeVWZJ5dDG2Lh=ABK-BDbwEa4MREZmscQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div>Can I vote "None of the above"? All of the options are
difficult to understand, although 1 is closer to comprehensible
than the others. In fact, I'd say this is going in completely
the wrong direction, since the ability to filter on "not X"
applies to *all* of the quick filter items, not just tags. Just
as you may want to see untagged messages, you might also want to
see read messages or messages not from one of your contacts.<b>
I would recommend an implementation that addresses all of
these at once (perhaps tri-state buttons for all of the main
filter buttons?). </b>The proposed implementation seems to be
pulling us away from this, which is short-sighted in my opinion.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>More generally, I disagree on the need to see untagged
messages alongside ones that have a specific set of tags. It
should be straightforward to perform two filter actions, first
for the untagged messages, and second for the tagged ones.</div>
</blockquote>
<p><tt>This comment should go into the bug. I think changing the
main filter options to tri-state is a very good idea ;-) That's
what Alta88's add-on TotalQuickFilter does
(<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/totalquickfilter/">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/totalquickfilter/</a>).<br>
</tt></p>
<p><tt>You, Jim, started the idea of having a survey for the
Correspondents, and as far as I know, the survey result wasn't
implemented in the end. :-(<br>
</tt></p>
<p><tt>Jörg.</tt><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>