<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19/12/2015 3:57 AM, Jörg Knobloch
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1328c2cc-8848-dcb1-4d0f-33b7b7f71016@jorgk.com"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17/12/2015 18:41, Gervase
Markham wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5672F3BB.6010401@mozilla.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Kent has proposed the following process, which I suggest may be a
reasonable compromise between all the competing factors. The existing
Council will serve as a nominating committee, and recruit candidates who
agree to serve on a renewed Council. (This could be existing Council
members or new people.) This slate of candidates would then be presented
to tb-planning for a single vote, much like the one a year ago, to see
if there is consensus.</pre>
</blockquote>
On 17/12/2015 23:56, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGOdq5kmL2WraK+sGx7fwomiedFZZOHktbq6T=-hs-hycvXaKQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><span
id="docs-internal-guid-bb90d8a4-b227-af3a-923c-07397cd8b9f2">
<p dir="ltr"
style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:14.6667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent">- Public Call For Nominations</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"
style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:14.6667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent">- Gerv or other neutral person collects nominations</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"
style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:14.6667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent">- CIVS poll is setup with each nominee (</span><a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/"
style="text-decoration:none"><span style="font-size:14.6667px;font-family:Arial;text-decoration:underline;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent">http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/</span></a><span style="font-size:14.6667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent">) </span></p>
<p dir="ltr"
style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:14.6667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent">- Public vote open to vouched Mozillians who identify as members of TB Community </span></p>
</span></blockquote>
<br>
I agree with Kent's proposal. The Council currently consists of
seven members, which can be found here:<br>
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Thunderbird#Thunderbird_Council<br>
<p>Or if you want to save the click:<br>
Kent James, Wayne Mery, Philipp Kewisch, Magnus Melin, Joshua
Cranmer, Mike Conley, Florian Quèze. <br>
</p>
<p>Council members are/were active contributors who make the bird
fly. If I understand Kent's idea correctly, he wants to replace
the not-so-active members with some more active ones.</p>
<p>Personally I don't see the need for nominations: The Council
already knows the people who are suitable new candidates. A
public vote is a nice idea, but also unnecessary, since there
are no competing parties. Contributing to discussions on
tb-planning is nice, but so far I haven't seen anyone step
forward to actively and consistently share the *responsibility*
for Thunderbird.</p>
<p>One Tuesday during the bi-weekly meeting Berna from the pEp
foundation said the following (quote):<br>
"Those who do the work should also have the lead, ..." - I fully
agree.<br>
</p>
<p>Jorg K.<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
+100<br>
What he said<br>
</body>
</html>