<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body ><div>No promises were made to qualcomm of course. We welcomed their initiative to create penelope on top of our code and encouraged judicious patch submissions. </div><div><br></div><div>But of course it's not our job to take sides in that kind of conflict.</div><div><br></div>-- da<div>(typed with thumbs)</div> <br><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org> <br>Date: <br>To: Ludovic Hirlimann <lhirlimann@mozilla.com> <br>Cc: David Ascher <da@mozilla.com>,tb-planning@mozilla.org <br>Subject: Re: Eudora/Penelope <br> <br><br>On 27/06/13 00:26, Ludovic Hirlimann wrote:<br>> Noise and unhappy people can be dealt with. I like Gerv's proposal. -<br>> Maybe we should aslo get in touch with the Eudora team before changing<br>> the page and retire the bugzilla component.<br><br>The Wikipedia page on Eudora[0], which seems to have been written by<br>disgruntled Eudora users editorializing, suggests that Qualcomm have<br>been ignoring all communications regarding Eudora. We can email the list<br>of developers on the wiki page, but I wouldn't hold out much hope.<br>Still, perhaps it's a necessary step.<br><br>dascher or anyone: did we make any promises to Qualcomm which might<br>affect our actions at this point, when they came to join us to do Eudora<br>OSE/Penelope?<br><br>Gerv<br><br>[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eudora_%28e-mail_client%29<br></body>