<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/29/2012 2:36 AM, Mark Banner
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:50B73AB1.4000603@mozilla.com" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
As mentioned, we're suggesting that we change the time and
frequency of the status meeting. <br>
<br>
.. Secondly, the frequency of the meeting.<br>
<br>
I think there's a few options here.<br>
<ul>
<li>Keep it weekly</li>
<li>Fortnightly</li>
<li>Every Three weeks</li>
</ul>
<br>
</blockquote>
This question is intimately associated with the question of the
content of the meeting which I discussed in my other post.<br>
<br>
If the point of the meeting is to discuss release preparation, I
would say that you should just do that in the drivers meeting.
Perhaps then we don't need status meetings at all.<br>
<br>
If the meetings are trying to accomplish some progress in
big-picture issues, as I suggested in my other post, then I would
suggest every 2 weeks as the rate.<br>
<br>
:rkent<br>
</body>
</html>