<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
<br>
[15.07.2010 21:21] »Dan Mosedale« wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4C3F5FAA.8040100@mozilla.org" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
On 7/15/10 11:23 AM, neandr wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4C3F520E.7080704@gmx.de" type="cite"> With
David coming on board we have seen some plans, very
enthusiastic eg. about the integration of LG with TB. <br>
<br>
Did I missed the updates to all of that?<br>
</blockquote>
Yes, see <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="http://ascher.ca/blog/2009/02/18/lightning_update/"><http://ascher.ca/blog/2009/02/18/lightning_update/></a>
for the details. That page specifically talks about Thunderbird
3, but the keep-it-as-an-addon plan is still current. Note that
as part of Thunderbird 3.1, the start page advertises Lightning to
end-users.</blockquote>
<br>
<span class="moz-smiley-s1"><span> :-) </span></span> I expected
this would lead to a misunderstanding, sorry not to modify my answer
before sending.<br>
Yes, I known a change for TB/LG took place. Alternatively I could
have taken one of my favorites: TB/AB or the use of "Categories"
across TB/LG.<br>
The question was more general about David's / the team's plans, the
plans for TB beyond 3.1, the TBnext. <span class="moz-smiley-s5"><span>
:-D </span></span><br>
</body>
</html>