<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 5/20/10 6:57 AM, Mark Banner wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4BF53FAC.608@mozillamessaging.com" type="cite">
<ul>
<li>Thunderbird 3.1: Unit test and .....?</li>
<ul>
<li>I'm on the fence here as to what to include. We're just
about to release (well hopefully in a few weeks) I'm not
sure if we also want to start producing nightly builds,
however like for the Thunderbird 3.0 branch, I think we
definitely want a unit test builder.<br>
</li>
</ul>
</ul>
</blockquote>
Agreed that we want unit tests. W.r.t. nightlies, some folks will
likely start using them and filing bugs against them if we provide
them, which may complicate our support and QA stories slightly.
That said, they are part of the future, and we'll have to accept
that load before too long anyway. I'd be interested in the QA &
support thoughts on this. Additionally, there's a question of what
the cost is in terms of build-end time/hardware/and virtual CPU
cycles.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4BF53FAC.608@mozillamessaging.com" type="cite">
<ul>
<li>Trunk: Depends, Nightly, Unit Test and Debug/Bloat builds</li>
<ul>
<li>i.e. the full set of tests and builds.</li>
<li>We still would not release the 64-bit builds, unless
Firefox started doing so as well - in general I don't think
we should release versions built on core where Firefox isn't
doing the same.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
</blockquote>
Totally agree.<br>
Dan<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>