[Council Meeting] Meeting notes from 2019-08-22

Tanstaafl tanstaafl at libertytrek.org
Thu Sep 19 14:57:27 UTC 2019


No one else sees this as a concern?

On Fri Aug 30 2019 09:53:17 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl
<tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote:
> On Thu Aug 29 2019 10:04:14 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), ba
> <ba at pep-project.org> wrote:
>> The Council at the time of the call consists of 7 seat holders without
>> deputies. In order to be quorate for voting, the call needs to have 1/2
>> of the Council members, which gives 4. The meeting is quorate. From now
>> on, motions can be passed with the agreement of a simple majority of
>> those present. The majority threshold is currently 4.
> 
> I'm a little concerned about this.
> 
> Shouldn't there be some kind of limit to what the 'majority threshold'
> can do?
> 
> Meaning, shouldn't larger questions require a full vote of all 7 members?
> 
> It is after all the age of the internet, it isn't like it is some kind
> of huge hardship for someone to be notified when an important vote is
> pending, and allow them to vote remotely.


More information about the tb-planning mailing list