Dropping legacy support: Moving forward
eyalroz at technion.ac.il
Tue Oct 15 20:18:27 UTC 2019
On 15/10/2019 15:56, Magnus Melin wrote:
> If you want to talk resources, I'd say add-ons support is much
> overspending what they "bring in". There is no financial justifications
> to spend more then necessary on them. Just try the numbers, it will fail
> bigtime. Remember maybe around 10% of users use add-ons *at all*. Maybe
> that means 1% is really what should be allocated for add-ons, if
> supporting them would be purely due to financial calculations. Where
> does that put experiments in some years? 0.05%?
Magnus, you're repeating arguments that have already been rebutted in my
email of 2019-10-03, without you replying to the rebut. Specifically,
you are citing statistics without providing the source of that
information nor an explanation on how those numbers were derived.
More information about the tb-planning