Add-on review times at ATN

Mark Rousell mark.rousell at signal100.com
Fri Mar 22 14:59:17 UTC 2019


Doh...

On 19/03/2019 17:46, Mark Rousell wrote:
> One way of doing this might be as follows:
> (1) Allow either addon authors and/or reviewers to mark an addon as
> being a possible upgrade path for one or more pre-existing addons.
> (2) This information would be exposed to end users in ATO.
> (3) And this information would also be exposed to users from within
> Thunderbird, allowing them to select a new author's replacement addon.
> If this approach was taken then clearly it would need to be decided
> how and when to show this information to users.
>
> Yes, I know that what I am proposing would need new developments with
> ATO, new developments in Thunderbird, and probably (a little) more
> work for reviewers. But it's an idea that could perhaps improve user
> experience when it comes to the unavoidable reality of abandoned addons.

s/ATO/ATN/

-- 
Mark Rousell
 
 
 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/tb-planning/attachments/20190322/cf9ab5ad/attachment.html>


More information about the tb-planning mailing list