Home Page Lo-Fi Wireframes: It's content time!
asdfghrbljzmkd at outlook.com
Wed Mar 13 17:29:28 UTC 2019
On 3/13/19 2:43 AM, Mihovil Stanić wrote:
> 13.03.2019 u 10:22, Wayne Mery je napisao/la:
>>> Just came to my mind when I was writing this reply, if TB ever
>>> decides to implement Firefox Sync, for any reason, it can be
>>> upgraded with "Send add-on to Thunderbird" option, just like you can
>>> send app from Google Play website to your mobile phone for
>> I think Matt's main point is that for the vast majority of users
>> (which does not include power users), the web version of AMO causes
>> real problems, and it is far preferable that they use the in-product
>> interface to AMO. That of course requires that there is great
>> functionality in the interface.
> Matt point is that he would remove browser access to AMO which is in
> my opinion very bad move.
> I agree it's not intuitive to install TB addon via browser, it sucks,
> and nobody should do it that way. But I can't remember single addon I
> discovered via Thunderbird UI, not one.
> It was always Google and/or AMO search, then refining that into 1 - 3
> addons that I think come close to what I want, then install each via
> Thunderbird interface, test and delete those that didn't satisfy my
Maybe have the Install button say e.g. "Install in Thunderbird", and
point to the URL 'thunderbird://addons/install/<addonname>', kinda like
how you can click an 'apt://' link in FF on Ubuntu and it will open the
> And on the bad since, all SEO gathered from addons will be lost.
> tb-planning mailing list
> tb-planning at mozilla.org
More information about the tb-planning