ExchangeCalendar Extension: Publication on ATN
jorgk at jorgk.com
Mon Aug 19 22:44:18 UTC 2019
On 19 Aug 2019 14:25, jwq wrote:
> There are, I understand from that Issue, likely to be some problems
> listing the extension because it uses an add-on identifier which is
> already on ATN (I've already confirmed that the 5.0.0-alpha3 xpi fails
> the validation test on this point) and because the extension may fail
> code review. I don't know how much of a problem it will be to resolve
> these issues.
> I do know that ExchangeCalendar has been identified as a critical
> extension on this very list (2 May 2017 02:40:46) and so I'm raising
> it here as an extension that might to be seen to be an important for
> future planning.
I'm a bit confused.
You're not one of the authors, are you? They seem to be Markus Weiland
(advancingu) and Adrien Dorsaz (Trim).
So why don't the authors change the add-on identifier and submit the
add-on to ATN. Then some reviewer can take care of it.
More information about the tb-planning