Re: Thunderbird’s future: a modern addressbook
cardbook.thunderbird at gmail.com
Wed Mar 14 13:40:29 UTC 2018
2/ CardBook works without the Thunderbird standard address book. It has
two regresssions, which are linked to the same function that cannot be
a/ the Junk emails Settings
b/ the quick filterbar and its "Contact" button
4/ yes of course I will continue to work on it whatever its integration
or not. For me it is far from being finished. If I may choose I'd like
to be integrated like Lightning, ie as an addon that can be easily
removed or replaced.
imho CardBook starts to be a pretty decent address book but I don't know
css, xml bindings and an indexedDB database, so no "new technologies".
It is relatively handy until 10 000 contacts but above writing an email
do not hesitate if you have any other questions :O)
Le 13/03/2018 à 18:04, Eyal Rozenberg a écrit :
> What about Philippe Vigneau, the extension's developer, himself? Can't
> he tell us most of the answer to no. 2, and possibly help with no. 3?
> Also, it looks like he's actively updating the extension, so probably
> the answer to 4 is "Yes".
> Anyway, I'm willing to volunteer time (probably around the end of this
> month) to read through the extension code and to the extent I can
> manage, the parts of the core code involving the address book, and map
> out what I can in terms of answers. If nobody else has gotten to this
> before I have, that is.
> Final note - can you elaborate a bit (either on- or off-list) about
> the "processes" you mentioned an extension author gets into if his/her
> extension gets integrated into the core code?
> On 3/13/18 5:29 PM, Aceman wrote:
>>> Od: Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org>
>>> Komu: tb-planning at mozilla.org
>>> Dátum: 13.03.2018 12:06
>>> Predmet: Re: Thunderbird’s future: a modern addressbook
>>> On Mon Mar 12 2018 20:44:10 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), TT Mooney
>>>> Nearly everyone needs a decent address book. What do we have to do to
>>>> make sure we have one in a default installation?
>>> There was a discussion some tim eback about simply integrating Carbook
>>> into the core code.
>>> I don't recall anything more of substance happening after that.
>> Hi. It is because the required manpower haven't changed since that
>> time (it seems it was about a year ago).
>> The integration isn't just "simply" throwing Cardbook into
>> Thunderbird source tree and you are done.
>> 1. somebody needs to decide this is a good idea and we want to look
>> at the addon. Maybe the new council elected soon will get the time to
>> do it.
>> 2. somebody needs to read the addon code to check how to integrate
>> it, also whether it works standalone, or on top of the existing AB
>> (which we then can't rip out). Does it not regress in some features
>> the existing AB has?
>> 3. there are about 2-3 active developers (volunteers!) able to do
>> this and help with the integration. Those are saturated with basic
>> maintenance tasks due to m-c changes so can hardly look at
>> enhancement possibilities like this one. This hasn't changed in the
>> last year. That's why the council is trying to hire more devs to
>> improve this problem.
>> 4. will the original addon author continue to work on the code once
>> it is integrated? If yes, great, but he will also need to adapt to
>> some of our processes. If not, then do we want to accept a blob of
>> code nobody understands and we need to learn it/adapt to it? Then
>> again, more devs would be needed.
>> I surely forgot something but you get the idea.
>> tb-planning mailing list
>> tb-planning at mozilla.org
> tb-planning mailing list
> tb-planning at mozilla.org
More information about the tb-planning