Skepticism about a new Electron-based product
ben.bucksch at beonex.com
Fri May 12 18:45:51 UTC 2017
R Kent James wrote on 12.05.2017 20:09:
> I've followed Myk Melez <https://mykzilla.org/>'s attempts at variants
> of Gecko that are not browsers, but as far as I can tell none have
> gotten any traction (Positron, qbrt, Headless Firefox). It's not clear
> to me that MoCo has interest in anything other than Firefox, and
> attempts to "go faster" and "focus" seem to encourage people to
> actively disengage from any effort that is not focused on a better
> Firefox. I don't mean that as a criticism, after all Firefox has its
> own difficult race to run, but we have to face reality. ...
> But just as Firefox has a difficult race to run, so does Thunderbird.
> Electron is available today, with lots of tutorials and support, and a
> rapidly growing ecosystem. In contrast, as Myk says, "qbrt is immature
> and unstable!". It would be great if Mozilla would embrace qbrt or a
> related project, and encourage Thunderbird to be the early demo of
> that. Hopefully now we will at least be invited to those discussions. ...
> So from the Thunderbird perspective, I would say that there is no
> decision to use Electron as the base of Thunderbird++, and I would
> hope that a decision on that would be delayed until considerably more
> experience is gained with the alternatives. We would welcome more
> engagement with the Mozilla platform team on how to effectively use
> Gecko technologies instead.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tb-planning