Removal of nsILocalFile and other interfaces, was: Upcoming change to fixIterator function in iteratorUtils.jsm

Wayne Mery vseerror at lehigh.edu
Tue Aug 8 17:16:07 UTC 2017


perhaps they would us a whiteboard notation for us.


On 8/8/2017 12:51 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
> That is the thing, with Firefox 57 it is no longer addon-compat due to WebExtensions. Before that, Firefox was fairly accurate with using the addon-compat iirc.
>
> Philipp
>
>> On Aug 7, 2017, at 8:34 PM, ace <acelists at atlas.sk> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe if m-c bothered to tag these changes/bugs with addon-compat
>> keyword, they would be easy to find. But e.g. bug 1375125 (nsILocalFile)
>> isn't marked. So I marked our porting copy.
>>
>> ----- Pôvodná správa -----
>> Predmet: Re: Removal of nsILocalFile and other interfaces, was: Upcoming
>> change to fixIterator function in iteratorUtils.jsm
>> Od: R Kent James <kent at caspia.com>
>> Pre: tb-planning at mozilla.org
>> Dátum: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:26:12 -0700
>>
>>> TL;DR: Could someone please step forward to maintain an information
>>> pages of gecko changes between TB 52 and TB 59 that affect addons?
>>>
>>> It is going to be quite a burden for our addon developers to maintain
>>> compatibility when m-c is removing interfaces and making other changes
>>> that were delayed until gecko 57 because of impact on extension
>>> developers. Many popular extensions are barely maintained, and the
>>> burden of figuring all of this out is going to be hard.
>>>
>>> We don't really have the resources to support all of the activities that
>>> the Mozilla addon team used to provide, but will stop providing after
>>> XUL addons are deprecated for Firefox in gecko 57. But it would be great
>>> if someone could step forward and maintain a page of changes needed to
>>> make a TB 52 addon compatible with TB 59.
>>>
>>> We may also need to rethink some fundamental addon policies for TB 59.
>>> Like, we will need to come up with our own review strategy, as I assume
>>> that the Firefox addon team will cease reviewing XUL addons. We should
>>> probably rethink the "compatible by default" decision that was made by
>>> Firefox years ago, but supported by them using an automatic scanning of
>>> addons for incompatible features, which we never implemented. The old
>>> system of relying on addon developers to flag their addons as compatible
>>> with TB 59 will probably be needed, as the vast majority of addons will
>>> no longer be compatible without maintenance effort by addon developers.
>>>
>>> :rkent
>> _______________________________________________
>> tb-planning mailing list
>> tb-planning at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning
> _______________________________________________
> tb-planning mailing list
> tb-planning at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/tb-planning/attachments/20170808/d8174ade/attachment.html>


More information about the tb-planning mailing list