Joining forces vs. starting from scratch (was Re: Proposal to start a new implementation...)
phill at hallambaker.com
Fri Apr 14 13:35:28 UTC 2017
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org> wrote:
> On 13/04/17 14:36, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> > If you are committed to really open source then MIT or BSD are by far
> > the best options.
> With respect, Phil, this sort of advocacy is precisely the sort of thing
> I am suggesting is not helpful at this juncture.
> It would be marginally less unhelpful if you were, by contributing to
> the discussion, agreeing to commit coding resources under your control
> to the Thunderbird++ project. Are you?
With respect Gerv, my long experience is that many people pushing for GPL3
suddenly stop doing so after they are required to read it and explain what
Since my code is under MIT License, my resources are available regardless.
Though I would have to know which language to target first if I was going
to write the back end of the code synthesizer. I have done C#, C, FORTRAN
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tb-planning