Help decide the UI for showing untagged messages in the Quick Filter - Errata and shortcomings of current vote, and why "Mark 2" makes better UX

Jörg Knobloch jorgk at jorgk.com
Fri Sep 30 23:42:57 UTC 2016


On 15/09/2016 22:10, Thomas D wrote:
> It gets worse when the alternatives put to vote are not clearly and 
> sufficiently or even wrongly described, which unfortunately applies 
> for this vote.
Sorry about that.

> Mark 1A, errata: Shift-Selection was never proposed. That's 
> *right-click*-selection to negate "Has Tag" into "Untagged (does not 
> have tag)".
Sorry, of course, right click.

> Mark 2, errata: Button order. First button is [show/hide *Untagged*]. 
> Second button is [show/hide *All Tagged*] (upon activation, showing 
> "all tagged", hence acting as a convenient "clear filter" button for 
> all specific tag filters and reliable indicator for "All tagged" 
> state; upon deactivation, hiding "all tagged", hence allowing for 
> "Untagged only" view).

Damn, you're right. You can see it in the picture though ;-)

You're right that one would need to see this in action, but we can't 
build three prototypes.

Jörg.

P.S.: So far there have only been 12 votes. 50% for Mark 1 and 50% for 
Mark 1A and 2.



More information about the tb-planning mailing list