Documentation fix patches

Magnus Melin mkmelin+mozilla at
Tue Jun 14 07:45:09 UTC 2016

Yes. Could also be useful in case hg server side hooks prevent landings 
without bug numbers.


On 14.06.2016 04:54, R Kent James wrote:
> So as I understand this, what y'all are propsing is a single metabug
> that would have simply have the hg landing. So I would create a single
> metabug, and then the comments to the bug would be something like
> landed Bug 1234567
> Fixed missing documentation in nsIMsgHdr, a=documentation-only
> On 6/13/2016 5:06 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
>> On 6/13/2016 1:44 PM, Magnus Melin wrote:
>>> Sounds pretty ok to me. We could have a metabug kind of thing that we
>>> link all the commits to though. Otherwise you have nowhere to discuss
>>> (after the fact) if someone lands wrong documentation.
>> I second this idea.
> _______________________________________________
> tb-planning mailing list
> tb-planning at

More information about the tb-planning mailing list