Changes to review policy

Blake Winton bwinton at mozilla.com
Sat Apr 30 16:17:54 UTC 2016


I was, but have mostly passed it on to Richard…
(We should make that official one of these days… ;)

Later,
Blake.
-- 
Blake Winton   UX Engineer
bwinton at mozilla.com

> On Apr 30, 2016, at 11:30, Chris Ilias <tb-planning at ilias.ca> wrote:
> 
> On 2016-04-28 1:33 AM, Jim Porter wrote:
>> Given the user outcry around the upgrade from the From/Recipients column
>> to the Correspondents column (see
>> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1152706> for example), I'd
>> like to propose some new guidelines to our review policy to prevent this
>> from happening again. To be rather blunt, I don't think we're upholding
>> the minimum standards of quality that people should be able to expect
>> from us.
> <snip>
>> 
>> Therefore, I'd like to propose the following: any change to
>> Thunderbird's defaults should have a super-review before landing.
> 
> Isn't there a Thunderbird UX module? If so, I think these decisions should be reviewed by the UX module owner/peers. Wasn't Blake doing that for a while?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tb-planning mailing list
> tb-planning at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/tb-planning/attachments/20160430/19cada57/attachment.html>


More information about the tb-planning mailing list