Why we need Gecko updates
axel.grude at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 21:39:24 UTC 2015
> > Gervase Markham wrote on 18.09.2015 15:32:
> >> To put it another way: "what would we have lost if we had forked m-c two
> >> years ago"?
> Two examples beside security bugs:
> * Ongoing improvements to the JS engine and APIs: Within the past two
> years, this includes (off the top of my head) ES6, Promises, Tasks,
> OS.File, shutdown blockers. These have already been very useful, and are
> key for any attempt to move more of the backend code from C++ to JS.
true. I used three out of these five and had to write wrappers to keep my Addons
Postbox compatible. So there is an argument for staying "in sync" as long as possible
to benefit from more improvements. The question is whether (in an ideal world) we
should prepare a parallel / alternative platform for an exit strategy. I have very
little hope that there will be funds / willingness for a "rewrite" to completely move
away from m-c...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tb-planning