Thunderbird and Addons
R Kent James
kent at caspia.com
Mon Aug 24 18:35:19 UTC 2015
We need to do some sort of announcement in the Thunderbird blog about
our plans concerning addons. I'd like to have feedback from folks to see
if there is any debate about what is the correct direction for us.
We've at least agreed that we are continuing to support binary addons.
Concerning signing, we took steps months ago to not move forward on
requiring addons to be signed, so there are no current plans to require
signing. There is still some debate about that in bug 1168571. We should
probably come to a firm decision and announce it. Most commenters were
opposed to signing, though there were some holdouts.
Then there is "The Future of Developing Firefox Add-ons - The Mozilla
that announces the complete disabling of current XUL addons at some
point in the future. Several Thunderbird community members commented on
that blog post, strongly opposed to that direction.
Contrast that with Firefox/Go Faster
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Go_Faster> where there are plans to
expand the use of addons in Firefox, adding so-called "system add-ons"
and moving Hello to one. (This is similar to what we are doing with
Lightning, which should hopefully make our Lightning integration easier
in the future).
At this point, I think that the prevailing viewpoint is probably the
following, and I would like to announce this if possible in a blog post:
1) Thunderbird continues to support binary addons.
2) Thunderbird will not require addon signing.
3) Thunderbird has no current plans to disable the use of traditional
XUL/XPCOM addons in Thunderbird.
This policy must be modified by the caveat "as long as core Mozilla code
can be used to support it".
(I might also note that initial patches are being looked at for the
integration of the technology formerly know as Skinkglue into
Thunderbird core, to be called JsAccount, which makes it possible to
define new account types in Thunderbird using a traditional
Could I have some comments or discussion on these proposed positions?
I hope the Thunderbird community appreciates that diverging from Mozilla
in this manner will probably mean that we will need to take over addon
review from Thunderbird at some point, possibly including forking of AMO
for our own use.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tb-planning