Thunderbird Reorganization Plan - the motivation

Vincent el.cameleon.1 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 10 06:46:58 UTC 2014


I also strongly agree with your proposal.

2014-09-10 8:38 GMT+02:00 Ludovic Hirlimann <lhirlimann at mozilla.com>:

>  On 08/09/2014 22:19, R Kent James wrote:
>
> I'd like to see if we can reach consensus on the general outline of a
> reorganization plan for Thunderbird. I hope it is clear to anyone that has
> been observing our efforts recently that there are issues with our current
> direction. Some symptoms:
>
> 1) The decision to confirm that we could spend Thunderbird income on a
> gathering of contributors, as promised to the community at the last
> reorganization, required intervention from the highest levels of Mozilla.
>
> 2) Thunderbird 31 released with very few new features.
>
> 3) comm-central has been closed now for about six weeks due to various
> breakages. This is really bad for engaging contributors, as well as slows
> down development. Collapse of Thunderbird as a product will start with long
> periods of time where we are unbuildable, so this is the first hints of
> collapse.
>
> 4) We have been unsuccessful so far at negotiating a resolution to the
> issues of repository structure that are needed for reducing our sensitivity
> to changes in the build system.
>
> 5) The process to confirm that we can publicly release information on our
> growing daily user count (which we sorely need to counter market perception
> that Thunderbird is dying) has taken over a year and is still not complete
> (though all indications are that we will have that approval soon).
>
> 6) The last entry on the Thunderbird blog was about one year ago, on
> September 13, 2013. Other aspects of public communication, such as release
> notes for Thunderbird 31, have also been inadequate recently.
>
> At the same time, our user base is growing, and we have a strong core team
> with good internal dynamics. Our product is strong, and we are part of a
> proud brand and organization. We have everything that we need to be
> successful, we just need to get behind a plan and execute.
>
> I'm going to post the minimal outline of what I think is needed in a
> separate communication, as I don't want to clutter that with the long list
> of problems that I have presented here. That communication will lay out key
> features of the reorganization plan, without too many details. I hope that
> we can reach a general consensus on the minimum plan in that document, and
> proceed to implement any negotiations that are needed to move it forward.
> Details are purposely omitted to try to get a list of the bare essentials
> of what we need to agree to.
>
> One reason that we need to do this now, rather than wait for the Summit,
> is that we hope to take the opportunity at the Summit to prepare a
> marketing video that would be a key part of the strategy moving forward. So
> we need to agree on pieces of the plan, particularly the piece about
> approaching our users directly for funding, so that we can do the video as
> part of the Summit.
>
> In the absence of a working governance model, one way that we can proceed
> with a reorganization is to have stakeholders add their name to a plan as a
> co-sponsor. What I will suggest is that I present my document, we have some
> discussions, and then I will modify the plan incorporating the input. Those
> who support the plan will be listed as co-sponsors. When you read the plan
> and comment, consider that you will be asked to be a co-sponsor of whatever
> we agree to.
>
> If in the end you cannot agree to the plan after discussion, then I would
> strongly encourage you to offer an alternate plan. The plan that I present
> may not be the perfect plan, or the only possible plan, but we need SOME
> plan. If not mine, please present your own. Or state clearly why you think
> that the status quo is working fine.
>
> Actual summary plan to follow.
>
>  ++++ because if nobody answers you'll feel nobody agrees.
>
> Ludo
> PS I visited the paris office yesterday for about 30min and checked our
> swag stock about 2 boxes of T-shirts one is the beige one with TB branding
> about 30 of these in XXL (count is aprox) and the other is the grey t-shirt
> from varsaw in different sizes.
>
> --
> [:Usul] MOC Team at Mozilla
> QA Lead for Thunderbirdhttp://sietch-tabr.tumblr.com/ - http://weusepgp.info/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tb-planning mailing list
> tb-planning at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning
>
>


-- 
Vincent (caméléon)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/tb-planning/attachments/20140910/9b745dd4/attachment.html>


More information about the tb-planning mailing list