Regressions in TB 31.x and 33
mkmelin+mozilla at iki.fi
Fri Oct 24 06:02:43 UTC 2014
On 24.10.2014 00:10, Archaeopteryx wrote:
> I am considering getting tracking-thunderbird38 and status-thunderbird38
>> tracking flags added that we can use to track issues the we are trying
>> to achieve in our next major release.
Getting the 38 flags showing already is a good idea, especially as the
in-between "blockers" would not really block unless they were real
showstoppers. It should probably be tracking-thunderbird_esr38 if we want to
follow the current convention.
> So, how do we distinguish hard blockers from things we want to get done, but
> are not essential?
Hard blockers should get tracking-thunderbird_esr38+
"Things we want done" for a particular release, and no staff does not work
very well together. Even if some things gets a plus, that buys you fairly
little besides some limited increased visibility.
We could just put [wanted-thunderbird-next] in the whiteboard as things come
up, and only some limited group would set that. But going through nominations
is really time consuming so I don't think it's really worth having a
requestable flag for it.
More information about the tb-planning