clokep at gmail.com
Fri Jul 11 16:20:41 UTC 2014
Looking over posts on the forum a bit it seems to be pretty much
"Fossamail comes with different defaults (both UI and under-the-hood) and
has been rebuilt with a newer compiler and better optimizations than
Otherwise, there aren't many differences. At least not at this time."
http://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=3642 pretty much talks in
circles that it's "optimized" but won't say how.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Kent James <kent at caspia.com> wrote:
> On 7/11/2014 3:47 AM, Ludovic Hirlimann wrote:
>> Shall we reach out to the guy so we can get whatever patches he applies ?
> Reading his material on that email client as well as their
> more-established browser alternative PaleMoon, it sounds like they are
> focused on tweaking settings and reversing controversial UI decisions
> (PaleMoon: "Familiar, efficient, fully customizable interface (no
> Australis!)" But perhaps someone with more than my 5 minutes of experience
> with them could comment. Still, if someone like Fossamail feels strongly
> enough about a UI or settings decision that they are willing to ship an
> alternate product with a tweak, perhaps we could revisit some of our
> decisions and make sure that we are confident that our defaults are what we
> What we should do is to reach out to them, make sure they know they we are
> happy they are shipping a similar product, and try to embrace them as part
> of the overall Mozilla comm-central community. Maybe even get them to
> consider sending someone to the summit!
> tb-planning mailing list
> tb-planning at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tb-planning