Comments on unmaintained products and technogies (bug 441414 #2)
Joshua Cranmer 🐧
Pidgeot18 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 28 14:36:11 UTC 2014
On 12/27/2014 5:13 PM, ace wrote:
> Could we take that patch into comm-central and have it as an extension
> to XUL (some override of the tree element)? Maybe we could get somebody
> knowledgeable in toolkit (e.g. Neil) to review it and maintain in this way?
This is a very special case of the XUL tree (nsITreeView), so the code
in question is not some XML element that is easily overridable but C++
code that deeply interacts with the layout code. Maintaining our own
copy I fear would be far too unmaintainable.
> I have personally not seen any official announcements or reasons why XUL
> would be deprecated already.
Because it's not The Open Web. And, to a lesser degree, it's Thunderbird
who needs this feature, not Firefox. If Firefox needed a multiline tree
view, it would be implemented before the end of the next quarter. The
belief is that HTML is now sufficient to replace XUL--but I'm not sure
that is the case, especially since our web components implementation is
still very incomplete.
Thunderbird and DXR developer
Source code archæologist
More information about the tb-planning