Donation link: next step
dave.koelmeyer at davekoelmeyer.co.nz
Fri Nov 29 05:35:42 UTC 2013
On 29/11/13 05:58, Wayne Mery (Thunderbird QA) wrote:
>> Really flattering articles such as
>> http://www.macnewsworld.com/story/79344.html continue to be missed on
>> the social networks which is just a huge shame. For example, Apple
>> stuffing up Gmail support in Mavericks Mail.app was a marketing angle
>> straight from heaven to be exploited by Mozilla, but there was no
>> offical mention of this on Facebook /et al/.
>> Quite frankly, I'm champing at the bit to help kickstart things here.
> No time like the present for anyone to step up their involvement -
> Sadly, publicity and marketing is missing from that list, which as you
> imply we don't do well. It's down under "Other" with
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Marketing ... which is incomplete
> and what was drafted afaik hasn't made progress.
> One of the failings of TB marketing IMO is we don't involve the user
> community enough. And Thunderbird's continuation requires community
> involvement now more than ever, as other threads have pointed out.
> Firefox* with its hundreds of employees can afford to not be so
> agressive in asking for community involvement in its UI. We can't
> survive with that model. (Plus Firefox* get their message out very
> effectively in other forms of mass marketting - we don't have that
> either.) End of story.
> Time for a group of people to hammer on these things, no?
High time. Your remark on involving the community more is echoed in my
initial comment at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=894241
This would be an ideal way in which a non-developer can contribute time
(something I am sure is a valuable commodity for developers and for
Mozilla staffers tied up with FFOS). Once we get a bit more engagement
going again with TB users on social networks then perhaps we can
carefully and collectively explore the notion of soliciting donations
via these channels?
In short: as soon as someone from Mozilla can grant me access I'm happy
to get started!
>>>> I see rather a few recent articles of large migrations to open source
>>>> productivity suites specifically mention Thunderbird (e.g.
>>>> Given that these organisations have spent so much effort switching,
>>>> and claim to have saved thousands in the process, then surely it
>>>> would be worth reaching out to them to see what financial or other
>>>> contributions they can make back to Thunderbird to keep the project
>>>> alive and open - and therefore continue to future proof their
>>>> investment in moving off proprietary systems.
>>> That's a tough sell. Esp. given that they move away to save money,
>>> they're not happy to spend it. Once it works and is accepted in the
>>> enterprise, the willingness to spend money goes to near zero. The only
>>> moment to pitch them is *before* they roll out, when they make their
>>> financial planning and schedule for the entire migration.
>> Tough perhaps, but I don't see this as insurmountable and it's surely
>> worth an enquiry.
> Indeed. In fact, why do we insist on the hit or miss approach of
> guessing what might work? We should just go and ask some of them what
> would motivate them.
> I started writing before I read all of these posts, and found myself
> repeating - so I'll just say we need to set a direction and execute.
> What's a thousand bucks to one of these big organizations compared to
> the cost of running some paid software? It's a way for them to give
> back - because it's not as if entrprises are showing up with
> developers to help - even though we ask.
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird/Enterprise for example has a link
> to https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird#Contributing
+1. Here's another one:
Consider the lengths they went to and extraordinary incentives from MS
they rejected to stay locked into their proprietary status quo. It would
be remiss *not* to approach them (specifically Mr Peter Hofmann).
More information about the tb-planning