The DarkMail Alliance

Chuck Peters cp at
Fri Nov 1 04:46:31 UTC 2013

On 10/31/2013 11:40 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote:
> On 10/31/2013 9:54 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
>> Details seem very sketchy. But I regularly come across more reasons why
>> email needs rearchitecting from the ground up[0] and it could be that
>> the Snowden revelations are the trigger necessary to do it. Particularly
>> if they can come up with a gradual migration path, such as advertising
>> support in traditional email headers so that remote clients and servers
>> can switch seamlessly.
> I did not sign up for their email distribution list, but only because
> I fear that it would not be a useful venue for technical discussion. I
> personally would decline incorporating any implementation without a
> specification at least as detailed as an RFC.

How about putting some developers on Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP
public keys with email addresses [1]?

As Paul Wouters said "It allows the mail client, or MUA, or MTA, to
encrypt a message during transport."



More information about the tb-planning mailing list