Eudora/Penelope

Wayne Mery (Thunderbird QA) vseerror at Lehigh.EDU
Thu Jun 27 15:31:10 UTC 2013


On 6/27/2013 4:39 AM, Unicorn.Consulting wrote:
> On 27/06/2013 4:56 PM, Ludovic Hirlimann wrote:
>> On 6/26/13 11:39 PM, David Ascher wrote:
>>> Maybe.  If those 12,000 people end up unhappy because TB doesn't do things that Eudora let them think they would be able to get, it ends up being a lot of noise and unhappy folks.
>>>
>> Noise and unhappy people can be dealt with. I like Gerv's proposal. -
>> Maybe we should aslo get in touch with the Eudora team before changing
>> the page and retire the bugzilla component.
>>
>> Ludo
>>
> There is some good stuff in the penelope code base, and quite honestly
> it would be nice to see some add-on developers pick over the bones and
> pull out some of the more interesting Eudora processes as add-ons.

yes

 > One of the failures of Penelope was it was to much to maintain.
>
> Matt

That, and an essential volunteer support base never (was) developed. 
Pretty much everything was built on the backs of the professionals.




More information about the tb-planning mailing list