Eudora/Penelope

Axel Grude (Axel) axel.grude at gmail.com
Thu Jun 27 14:53:59 UTC 2013


On 27/06/2013 09:39, Unicorn.Consulting wrote:
> On 27/06/2013 4:56 PM, Ludovic Hirlimann wrote:
>> On 6/26/13 11:39 PM, David Ascher wrote:
>>> Maybe.  If those 12,000 people end up unhappy because TB doesn't do things that Eudora let them think they would be able to get, it ends up being a lot of noise and unhappy folks.
>>>
>> Noise and unhappy people can be dealt with. I like Gerv's proposal. -
>> Maybe we should aslo get in touch with the Eudora team before changing
>> the page and retire the bugzilla component.
>>
>> Ludo
>>
> There is some good stuff in the penelope code base, and quite honestly it would be 
> nice to see some add-on developers pick over the bones and pull out some of the more 
> interesting Eudora processes as add-ons.  One of the failures of Penelope was it was 
> to much to maintain.
Good idea; I think this should be driven by demand from the (Ex-)Eudora users. We 
won't build something nobody asks for.

Is there a mxr-type web repository somewhere?

Axel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/tb-planning/attachments/20130627/0b080354/attachment.html>


More information about the tb-planning mailing list