Thunderbird versioning/Naming.

Unicorn.Consulting at
Thu Jul 4 23:56:20 UTC 2013

If this has been discussed in the past, sorry for trying to bring it up 

With the first release of Thunderbird under it's new release model I 
think that it is important to de-emphasise the version number as the 
jump from 17 to 24 will leave many wondering what is going on.  To this 
end I suggest that the version number become an internal/troubleshooting 
item much as the geko version has done and that we release Thunderbird 
with a year appended as has become almost dejure over the last decade.  
Yes I know everyone else has started going back to numbers, but 
Thunderbird is not in the Chrome race to 1000 and we need to make it 
clear we are not.

Years ago when products started being released as year based versions I 
thought that is was the silliest of ideas, but in this case where we 
will be having an annual release it makes sense to name the product 
intrinsically for the year of release. Given the lateness on the year I 
suggest we release Thunderbird 2014 instead of Thunderbird 24.  This 
approach sets the user expectation on release schedules correctly to an 
annual or more cycle, makes it easy for even the slowest among them to 
work out that their Thunderbird is 5 years old and in my opinion 
differentiates the versioning from Firefox so people can stop asking 
"Firefox is at Version 20 where is the Thunderbird update.


  "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Benjamin Franklin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3766 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <>

More information about the tb-planning mailing list