Changes to mozilla-central test automation
mconley at mozilla.com
Wed Feb 27 20:06:25 UTC 2013
>> I beg to differ, we do actually use automation.py(.in) in Mailnews Bloat
>> tests and in the Mozmill tests:
Welp, shows what I know.
I've given r+ on 840954, so I guess we can move forward on this.
On 27/02/2013 2:48 PM, Mark Banner wrote:
> On 27/02/2013 19:40, Mike Conley wrote:
>> Hey Jonathan,
>>>> We will make additional posts to mozilla.dev.platform about this topic
>>>> as needed; do members of the Thunderbird community who are involved in
>>>> Thunderbird test automation monitor that newsgroup?
>> I think you've got all the right people here on tb-planning.
>> I mostly deal with Mozmill testing, and am more of a test-writer - I
>> don't usually deal with the automation mechanisms.
>> That having been said, a cursory look through our tests, and I don't
>> see us using automation.py anywhere. So take this as my tentative
>> thumbs up for your upcoming change. :)
> I beg to differ, we do actually use automation.py(.in) in Mailnews Bloat
> tests and in the Mozmill tests:
> Before we can use mozbase we need to get review on
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=840954, and then back out
> the releng temporary fix that was working around a busted tree.
> I don't tend to watch platform these days (as too much traffic for me to
> handle) but feel free to cc me on important bugs etc, and let us know
> about more updates.
> tb-planning mailing list
> tb-planning at mozilla.org
More information about the tb-planning