Fwd: Filelink for Large Attachments - Alternative Filelink provider

Andreas Wagner mozilla at andreaswagner.org
Fri Aug 9 16:55:35 UTC 2013


I don't see any binary components in this add-on.

I'm going to review it soon!

Andreas

On 08.08.13 23:34, Axel Grude wrote:
> Yes; I briefly considered having an attempt at review but binary is 
> definitely out of my league. Not many other reviewers specialize in 
> Thunderbird.
>
> Axel
>
>
> On 08/08/2013 21:41, Kent James wrote:
>> Two months is longer than usual, but not outside of the normal 
>> variation. In the last editor report, 71% of initial full reviews 
>> were taking more than 10 days. There are very few reviewers with 
>> specific expertise in Thunderbird, so Thunderbird reviews lately 
>> might be quite slow.
>>
>> For my own main addon (ExQuilla), which is probably one of the worst 
>> addons that they have to review, I just got an update approval 
>> yesterday after being in the queue since June 20, so that is 7 weeks 
>> for an update approval.  I don't think that is typical, but 
>> represents current worst case, since mine is a massive, intrusive, 
>> binary, Thunderbird addon that always needs admin review.
>>
>> :rkent
>>
>> On 8/7/2013 2:29 PM, Jonathan Protzenko wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please don't hesitate to ping amo-editors at mozilla.org ; two months is
>>> not really acceptable, and if you send a friendly message there stating
>>> that you've been in the queue for two months, I'm sure someone will
>>> take some time to make sure you're processed quickly.
>>>
>>> Please keep in mind that it's the holiday season, so we may have less
>>> reviewers than usual. In any case, the folks that are on
>>> amo-editors at mozilla.org are usually very friendly and understanding.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> jonathan
>>>
>>> On Tue 06 Aug 2013 04:59:24 PM CEST, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
>>>> On 08/06/2013 03:40 PM, Vincent wrote:
>>>>> Hi gents,
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems that an add-on developers is quite unhappy about his add-on
>>>>> approval delays (see message bellow).
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this normal delay or not? Is there anything that can be done?
>>>> I do not really put pressure for this addon.
>>>>
>>>> But I am slightly surprised, since this is my first addon I submit 
>>>> as a
>>>> developer. As a user I really had no idea that at the current rate,
>>>> firefox releases come out faster than addon reviews. Doesn't look
>>>> sustainable.
>>>>
>>>> I was always under the impression that addon developers were lazy...
>>>>
>>>> I'm distributing this addon as part of my software package, and since
>>>> users can install it when they need, I really feel no need to 
>>>> complain.
>>>> I'm purely submitting this for added discoverability (and a 
>>>> passionated
>>>> hate against "cloud" providers).
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> tb-planning mailing list
>>>> tb-planning at mozilla.org
>>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tb-planning mailing list
>>> tb-planning at mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tb-planning mailing list
>> tb-planning at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tb-planning mailing list
> tb-planning at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/tb-planning

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/tb-planning/attachments/20130809/64d7202f/attachment.html>


More information about the tb-planning mailing list