Philosophy of minimal disturbance of existing users

Unicorn.Consulting at
Sat Sep 15 23:23:49 UTC 2012

On 16/09/2012 12:10 AM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 07:49 PM, Kent James wrote:
>> As another user interface issue, I just tried some new Daily runs, 
>> and immediately notice that my menus are gone.
> This is part of the larger Australis design based on Steven Horlanders 
> design and Richard Marti did an amazing job here.
>> That forces a dramatic change in the way that I am used to working. 
>> While I understand the reasons behind it, and probably agree with 
>> them, for the typical user who had gotten used to doing things a 
>> certain way, this is just an annoyance. Today may not be the day that 
>> I really wanted to stop what I was doing, and figure out how to turn 
>> the menus back on. The reaction of most existing users, IMHO, is 
>> going to be a mild round of cussing at the arrogance of developers 
>> who are constantly pushing change on users who really don't want it. 
>> (Now I've been the guy getting cussed at in the past, and there are 
>> times that change is needed, I understand that).
> I can see your point of view, but at the same time I wonder if we 
> might have a obligation towards our current user base to allow them to 
> get more space to read their e-mails. 
Personally I am sick of hearing about how one line is going to give more 
space, particularly in planning where I have about 12 lines of header 
making reading space in the preview window almost impossible.  I am 
sorry, but I would see making the mail header collapsible as a far more 
useful activity.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3766 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <>

More information about the tb-planning mailing list