Papercuts remixed - the bug list
axel.grude at gmail.com
Fri Jul 13 15:43:05 UTC 2012
> If it is OK to nominate bugs that are already in some progress or taken,
I definitely think this must be possible. Especially these long standing ones are the
ones giving Tb somewhat bad press. format=flowed anyone?
> I'd nominate bug 92165, bug 536768, bug 327812, bug 80855, bug 314806, bug 244347.
> Including taken bugs has the advantage that the developer has an idea if he really can fix them. Otherwise commiting to imaginary papercut bugs is problematic when they are not yet determined.
>> Od: "Joshua Cranmer"<Pidgeot18 at verizon.net>
>> Komu:<tb-planning at mozilla.org>
>> Dátum: 13.07.2012 01:22
>> Predmet: Re: Papercuts remixed - the bug list
>> On 7/12/2012 6:34 PM, Axel wrote:
>>>> Josh wrote: I've made
>>>> <https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird/Papercuts> to keep track of
>>>> this initiative.
>>> so can we just add any bugs we think are annoying (even if we already
>>> work on them) ?
>>> (I wasn't quite sure of what constitutes a papercut, but if it is
>>> sharp enough to cut me then I would probably think my own bugs are
>>> papercuts as well)
>> Yes, add any bug you think is persistently annoying. The intent is to
>> use voters to see which papercuts are really important and which ones
>> are not.
>> Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
>> tb-planning mailing list
>> tb-planning at mozilla.org
> tb-planning mailing list
> tb-planning at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tb-planning